Forum Message
| | Message text Regis wrote:
Killer1 wrote:
I'm right there with you on your feelings towards some of the players on this site. I too am appalled at the unwillingness of some players on this site to allow possible improvements in the game.
It just goes to show the extent on how some gamers lack sufficient educating and/or knowledge on this subject.
Pfeww, what a statement...
Possible improvement does not mean ascertained improvement.
Because someone disagree does not mean he lacks education or knowledge (he could return you the same anyway).
If a majority of Youplay.it BM players is against the change, then it may be that the proposed improvement is not perceived as such.
So instead of blaming the people refusing the change, obviously setting them against you, why not trying to counter argument the given reasons and convince them of the possible benefits?
Your are definitely not a politician 
I will be the politician and suggest a comprimise that I mentioned 2 days ago which is to create a few test scenarios that allow alternate fuel, thereby not contaminating the other scenarios and yet letting us see if the variable fuel option makes sense. |
|
|
|
|
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
