LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Wynne, Arkansas IE
Personal Data:Male, born: November 26 1954
Membership21years 130days ago.
Last Login3years 359days ago.
Last Move3years 349days ago.
kduke is currently Offline!Send a mail to kduke


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: Crtitcal hits
Posted by: kduke - 20years 81days ago.
Message text
Dealing with the very first item in this thread, I too am noticing a lot of critical hits, especially in odd situations.

The main time I get "fabric tears" or "engine damage" is when someone is shooting at me on table 1 or 2 and just barely gets a hit.

So I'm flying a plane with 1 or 2 wing/engine boxes checked off and my performance is degraded, while at other times I have 1/4 of an airplane left and do speeds and maneuvers just fine.

We'll skip over the "learn to fly" crap.

I found the airplane discussions--especially involving the original designer-- very interesting. I had read elsewhere the "Camel at 15,000 feet" explanation-- and have to side with the opinion that asks, "what are we doing fighting ONLY at 15K.

Yes, I know, the original BM had everyone on the same altitude (fine with me) but the choice of making that magic spot at 15K feet is not something I've ever understood. With a few exceptions, I think most of the planes flying that high were looking to have a position advantage and dive on their enemy. (And please don't bother to correct me-- I know some planes could fly at 20k-- for awhile-- but could not really maneuver up there... and that the Germans had some 2 seaters going even higher. I said "most planes.")

10K feet would have seemed a much more likely choice-- but that is a decision made long ago. An unfortunate decision, since it makes certain planes "look bad." As i recall from my reference books (and I have the same ones cited above), the Camel was the most-produced fighter of the war. But in Blue Max, it is one of the crummier overall planes.

One disagreement-- that the Pfalz should share the Alb DV chart. Nope-- It was a slow puppy. Maneuverable, sturdy, and other nice things, but much slower than the DV.

The next Wings of War rendition will have the Pfalz D3 and Alb. D3 share maneuver decks (the Pfalz will be able to take more damage). Maybe one can disagree with that-- I'm not sure. I have heard the 'snap roll left" thing from several sources but always secondary, so I really don't know.

But it's nice to see a historical discussion here-- with mostly good exchange if ideas and not much sappy cuteness.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

20years 87days Impailer [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
20years 87days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
20years 87days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
 20years 81days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  20years 81days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  20years 81days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  20years 81days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 81days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Impailer Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
20years 87days Bramley Bomber Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
 20years 81days kduke Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
  20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Sackman_Dan Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days flying_neko Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Hans Johansohn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 80days Troll Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
       20years 80days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
        20years 80days Troll Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
         20years 80days dakadave Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
        20years 39days castiglione Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 79days flying_neko Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 79days imdog Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 79days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 79days flying_neko Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     20years 79days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
      20years 79days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
       20years 78days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
        20years 78days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
         20years 78days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
          20years 73days kduke Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
   20years 39days castiglione Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 38days Phil Hall Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 38days Crash and Burn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
    20years 38days Ashtar Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     20years 38days Crash and Burn Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
     20years 38days castiglione Re: [BM][RULES] Crtitcal hits
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

20years 38days Crash and Burn [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
20years 38days kduke Re: [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
 20years 37days Crash and Burn Re: [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
  20years 37days kduke Re: [BM] error with the SPAD 13 & 7, number of tail boxes
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

20years 40days Steadman [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
20years 39days flying_neko Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
20years 39days Steadman Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
 20years 38days flying_neko Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
20years 38days Nick Re: [OT] Why not move WSIM already?
Page generated in: 20.3125 milliseconds.