Templars wrote:
You guys take this "game" far too seriously telling the OP to suck it up, and all that BS. If I were him, I would name the unethical player in question - this is what a forum is - a place to say what you want - when you want.
I would say name him also if he won't answer to questions. As you can tell from other responses here, some people get bent out of shape when you name them instead of responding in a useful manner. It doesn't change the facts though. I suppose you can just ignore the responses.
As for the game, there are so many problems with it, when my last game is finally finished, I am done. It has always been treated as the ugly step-sister on this site, which is a damn shame seeing the board game isn't bad at all.
Yeah, I hear you there. Clearly, it is the least important game on the site. I think some of that is programmers who know that game vs the others. Still, it is the lowest on the totem pole and the bugs are plentiful to make it a questionable game.
I keep thinking I will do the same, quit. But, I do love WS&IM, so, it's hard to do! |