Message text Oh, I guess I should explain, that previous message was meant as a joke. From another previous thread, I guess the Italians will get it and laugh, and the Americans will take offense.
We all have to work with the tools we're provided. Heck, even I use Microsoft products....... at work.
I truly did enjoy the intellectual discussion on the mathematics behind random number generators, and Psuedo Random Number Generators that aren't really random and have a tendancy to repeat themselves cyclically, and tend to be used in programming languages, and seem to be good enough for games but not good enough for generating random numbers in encryption.....
There seems to be an incongruity here in my mind, and that's what I wanted to figure out. As long as I know there's something going on, and it can be scientifically explained, I'm cool with that. I may not personally like it, but I can except it.
Obviously, I've come to my own conclusion on this topic and y'all can formulate your own. I wasn't going to post anymore on this topic, but wanted to respond to Nick and thank him for paying attention to this thread. I'm just trying to figure this stuff out for myself and I thank each and every one of you who have helped me.
Happy flying to all.
Impailer |
|
|
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
