LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

Country:CX
Personal Data:Male, born: June 17 1960
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.boardgamegeek.com
Membership18years 140days ago.
Last Login18days 17h ago.
Last Move18days 17h ago.
derekticus is currently Offline!Send a mail to derekticus


Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
Posted by: derekticus - 17years 19days ago.
Message text
sfatula wrote:
Lobster wrote:


Okay, I will concede the playability/programming issue. How about we just get rid of rake all together? Just set the hit table modifier for rake to +0. Maybe set it to +1 and that would tone it down sufficiently while still leaving it in.

As to the no turning with no sails, I assume that should be an easy check. Just check to see if it has rigging, if rigging = 0 then no turning. Alternately the ship could just surrender once it gets to the no rigging standpoint. It already surrenders if it gets raked with no rigging.

Thanks for the response.

Lobster


Lobster,

One of the main design goals for the game seems to be to follow the original board game rules as closely as possible. So, since the original rules were written as they were, so is this game. So, the rake, etc. are all from the board game rules. There are also advanced rules, which change some of this behavior, but, they are not programmed in at this time.

Many people seems to want all sorts of more realistic changes, but, the idea was to follow the original rules. Implementing advanced rules would in fact make the game "more realistic", but, there would be a lot of effort to do so as there are a lot of changes. Maybe they will some day.


Please note also, in the original game one could turn ships once riggingless, however it was not at the current "1 rotation per turn" rate. The rate was slowed based on the type of ship, SOL 1 or SOL 2, etc.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 19days Lobster [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
17years 19days Ogrebait2 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
 17years 19days Lobster Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days Ogrebait2 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
   17years 19days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
    17years 16days Poohshoes Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
    17years 16days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 16days R1066 [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
17years 16days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
 17years 16days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
  17years 16days R1066 Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
   17years 15days GraysGhost Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 16days tomski [BM][BUG] Fired bonus with guns jammed
17years 16days rainbow Re: [BM][BUG] Fired bonus with guns jammed
Page generated in: 31.64063 milliseconds.