LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Crown Point, IN US
Personal Data:Male,
Membership17years 200days ago.
Last Login11years 343days ago.
Last Move12years 138days ago.
Ogrebait2 is currently Offline!Send a mail to Ogrebait2


Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
Posted by: Ogrebait2 - 17years 19days ago.
Message text
Lobster wrote:
Ogre;

Okay, I will concede the playability/programming issue. How about we just get rid of rake all together? Just set the hit table modifier for rake to +0. Maybe set it to +1 and that would tone it down sufficiently while still leaving it in.

As to the no turning with no sails, I assume that should be an easy check. Just check to see if it has rigging, if rigging = 0 then no turning. Alternately the ship could just surrender once it gets to the no rigging standpoint. It already surrenders if it gets raked with no rigging.

Thanks for the response.

Lobster


I think there is sufficient historical precedent for turning without rigging (rowboats or jury-rigged sails). IIRC, the original board game rules allowed de-masted ships to pivot every other game turn. There may be a programming issue that does not allow for "every other turn" movement. Given the choice between pivoting or not, I think most players would opt to retain the capability.

I would make a similar argument for rake shots. IMO, eliminating them goes a bit too far. Besides, with out the ability to rake, some of these games would go on forever. As previously mentioned, adjustments for field of fire already exist, but that may require programming resources that are not available anytime soon.

Ogre

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 19days Lobster [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
17years 19days Ogrebait2 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
 17years 19days Lobster Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days Ogrebait2 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
   17years 19days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
    17years 16days Poohshoes Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
    17years 16days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 16days R1066 [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
17years 16days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
 17years 16days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
  17years 16days R1066 Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
   17years 15days GraysGhost Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 16days tomski [BM][BUG] Fired bonus with guns jammed
17years 16days rainbow Re: [BM][BUG] Fired bonus with guns jammed
Page generated in: 28.51563 milliseconds.