LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Windham, Maine US
Personal Data:Male,
Membership18years 87days ago.
Last Login15years 319days ago.
Last Move15years 254days ago.
Lobster is currently Offline!Send a mail to Lobster


Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
Topic:Rules
Subject: Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
Posted by: Lobster - 17years 19days ago.
Message text
Hello;

I am not sure if this has been discussed or not, but Raking is too powerful the way the rules are at this point.

Raking out to maximum range anywhere in the bow/stern arc is absurd and no where even close to realistic. Raking should at the minimum be limited to 5 hexes and only along the row of hexes extending forward/aft from the bow/stern hexes only.

Raking is supposed to represent firing down the length of a ship and from the little bit of reading I have done on naval warfare in this time frame hard to achieve. Yet, in this game, raking occurs regularly and easily.

================
An extreme example: Game 436507, turn 4

As you can see Gibraltar is firing at Formidable and getting the raking modifier. Gibralter is at maximum range (10 hexes) and on the extreme limit of the bow arc.
================

Actually, now that I am writing this out and thinking a tad more. Raking should have a negative hit table modifier but a positive die roll modifier for rolling on the resultant hit table. After all the bow/stern of a ship is a smaller target than the broadside but any actual hit has a great chance to do damage due to the cannonball traveling down the greater length of the ship. But it should still be limited to range 5 at the maximum.

Thanks;

Lobster

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 19days Lobster [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
17years 19days Ogrebait2 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
 17years 19days Lobster Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days Ogrebait2 Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days Tornade Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
  17years 19days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
   17years 19days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
    17years 16days Poohshoes Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
    17years 16days sfatula Re: [WS&IM][RULES] Raking (repost, cause I did not see my original)
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 16days R1066 [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
17years 16days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
 17years 16days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
  17years 16days R1066 Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
   17years 15days GraysGhost Re: [BM][RULES] Hit in the tail from the front?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 16days tomski [BM][BUG] Fired bonus with guns jammed
17years 16days rainbow Re: [BM][BUG] Fired bonus with guns jammed
Page generated in: 25.39063 milliseconds.