LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:HONG KONG, ASIA, EARTH, SOL, MILKY WAY HK
Personal Data:Male, born: January 01 1975
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.instagram.com/orzxsto
Membership22years 15days ago.
Last Login12h 47' ago.
Last Move12h 42' ago.
imdog is currently Offline!Send a mail to imdog


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Other
Subject:Re: just a reply
Posted by: imdog - 11years 43days ago.
Message text
dcr66 wrote:.

...
1)In the old Squadron Campaign days of over 6 yrs ago, map size used were 10x8 I believe and scenarios are mostly the "boring" category. I caught the tail end of that era and only managed to get into couple series before the organizers disappeared.


I am lucky enough to witness and participate the 3 stage of hurbert quoted and here is some footnot plus my own obseravtion.

Actually from yr1 to yr5 (03-08), There is some small campaign organised by me and die-hard players but it is not very common. Participants response is very good and Coordinator are quite happy to do so.

On the map size, I prefere small (8x10) and (10x10) as it involves more dogfight. I like 8x8 most for dancer type plane (triplane) but it is bad for runner's type plane like Nieuport 28.

I rarely join games on 17x12 as Allies always use to their advantages for more fuel and hunt for German easy prey.

After the introduction of League, organizers like me find it difficult to recruit individual to join games. So we gradually stop organizing games.


2) After those period ended there were another era of competitions (some were team/squadron bases) where someone created web pages to track the progress. Map size were 10x8 as well and usually involve no more than 3 on each side.



Yap, this period is around 6 yrs ago and I am not that active. However I have organized Tomkey with a group of 10-12 pilots so that we held inter-squad campaign regularly, I miss those good old days.


3) After that came Kit (GraysGhost) squadron campaign. Slow play creeps in and people lost interest. Kit's campaign was based on different war periods hence people cannot just go on to next set of games without the first sets being done so experience/casualties can be calculated. It was not easy to have games finished follow by waiting period of 4 weeks. And we have to hunt p.eople down again. Attendance were bad enough for Kit's campaign that anonymous clones had to be used, something that was not necessary in the old days.


Kit's cmpaign mode is the best time of the site I would say. Inter-Squad/ Intra-Squad league competition is common. And team leader exchange info, try around manually managed campaign mode.

But the admin involved is really demanding.


The only games that I created these days are over in WSIM beta. For BM and regular WSIM, I join whatever games I like that in the pending list. As for leagues I don't usually join that early as I try hard to avoid unknown new players who have a great tendency to become automovers especially if they join way too many leagues. Many of them don't realize 5 leagues of the larger types will mean over 100 games. There were mechanisms in the old Nick days to prevent that but I think they stopped working sometime ago.


The league system is both a good and bad design. The mulitiple game play ensure fairness. However joining a league means that you promise game sets from 9 to 25. Which it means if you join 2 league you will need to login everyday to ensure league flow.

The commitment is not easy and new users find there is a sharp learning curve from leisure play to league.

Also the league system is the LAST major site system development, WS&IM is different as it is a seperate project. Later we have Gonzaga but it is also a seperate project too. Nick, the site creator found its very time consuming for admin work and two years ago sell the site to Jim. And then the site keep as is up to now.

I am now discussing with the Management team about the development of the site, hope in 1/2 weeks time we can have some good news for you all.

Cheers

.

--- Message edited by imdog

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

11years 48days wiggervoss [BM][OT] just a reply
11years 46days imdog Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
 11years 46days GraysGhost Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 45days markrendl Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 45days dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 45days GraysGhost Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 44days markrendl Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
   11years 44days dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
    11years 43days imdog Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 43days BlackSheep Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
   11years 40days imdog Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 44days jtbourke Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 43days BlackSheep Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
   11years 43days dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
  11years 44days jtbourke Re: [BM][OT] just a reply
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

17years 294days BazJP [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
17years 294days docmortand Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
 17years 294days Bramley Bomber Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
 17years 292days BazJP Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
  17years 292days flying_neko Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
  17years 291days throbmaster Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
 17years 291days Zarby Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
  11years 40days BazJP Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
   11years 39days Christie Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
    11years 39days imdog Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This is pointless
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

11years 120days wiggervoss [BM][IDEAS] abilities
11years 119days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
11years 119days BlackSheep Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
11years 117days imdog Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
 11years 116days BlackSheep Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
11years 119days markrendl Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
 11years 48days wiggervoss Re: [BM][IDEAS] abilities
Page generated in: 35.9375 milliseconds.