LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

Country:CA
Personal Data:Female, born: November 20 1963
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy9Sgmth_rc
Membership20years 120days ago.
Last Login12years 314days ago.
Last Move12years 330days ago.
Tornade is currently Offline!Send a mail to Tornade


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Program code error
Subject:Re: Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
Posted by: Tornade - 19years 231days ago.
Message text
litehoof wrote:
pokerguy wrote:
Tornade wrote:
Blue Max Game 250786, Turn 27

i just got shot down by a tail hit in a situation where a tail hit is NOT possible to obtain

the observer in the Halberstadt fired into the FRONT hex of my aircraft and scored a RED tail hit...
after looking at the rules carefully...observers do not recieve any special consideration when firing at targets from directly in front or directly in the back...and further that tail hits are converted to engine hits

in this particular case it makes a significant difference as it is a campaign game AND also the difference between being shot down and NOT being shot down...my engine is in pristine condition



It seems to only apply if you are directly behind the 2 seater, otherwise you can get hit anywhere.

You get the deflection when firing from the 2 seater unless they are firing directly out of the tail hex. Your position would then come into effect for converting tails to engines. When you are firing at an angle at a tailgunner they are assumed to have raked your plane as they went by you, making it possible to hit anywhere on your plane, regardless of final position. I hate that rule. When we played the actual board game we always went by final plane position. Then again the tail gunner didn't have to count deflection penalty in either.


i went over the rules again...
it is definitely a bug...we are not really talking about deflection here...but a matter of WHERE the damage should have gone

there is no exception that i can find to the rule that when firing through the front hex of an aircraft that Tail hits become Engine hits...and vice versa...observers arent exempted from this rule

going back to what you were saying about raking fire...in this particular case it would be a matter of moving from a position where he had NO shot to one where he had a shot into my front hex
...so even that argument would not hold a lot of water...nor is the target's previous position considered when determining deflection or eligibilty for firing

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 231days Tornade [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
19years 231days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
19years 231days litehoof Re: [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
 19years 231days Tornade Re: [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
  19years 231days litehoof Re: [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
19years 231days Just4Fun Re: [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
 19years 231days Tornade Re: [BM][BUG] Tail Hit should have been converted to Engine Hit
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 233days Bombadil [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
19years 232days pokerguy Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
19years 232days Bombadil Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
 19years 232days pokerguy Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
19years 232days ksnake Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
19years 231days gugliandalf Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
 19years 231days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
  19years 231days gugliandalf Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
   19years 231days ksnake Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
19years 230days Bombadil Re: [BM][HUMOUR] This won't fly
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 234days Templars [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
19years 234days tomski Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
19years 234days DBurkeG Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
19years 233days BlackSheep Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
19years 233days Bombadil Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
 19years 233days Templars Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
 19years 233days ksnake Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
   19years 233days Bombadil Re: [BM][OT] New players listed in a different color
Page generated in: 30.46875 milliseconds.