LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Troisdorf DE
Personal Data:Male,
Membership19years 225days ago.
Last Login5years 231days ago.
Last Move10years 144days ago.
Rottillo is currently Offline!


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Other
Subject:Re: New Aircraft
Posted by: Rottillo - 19years 98days ago.
Message text
warrax wrote:

No way!
This would make the Brist far too much powerful!!!
Things on youplay are as they are for some reasons:
1) There is no rule yet implemented for Lewis guns ammo, so the double gun wouldn't have the only disadvantage it had in the original boardgame (having to reload, and running out of ammos...)
2) I'm not an expert, so I just recall someone else comment stating that the Brist was historically flown mostly with only one gun (mostly for saving load), even if the model had been designed for two...
3) When the observer rule was first implemented on youplay, the first fully functional Brist was designed with two guns, but after a short time it was evident it made playing againts it veeeery umbalanced...



In order not to make existing scenarios unbalanced one of course has to keep the single gun Bristol. I am asking to ALSO have the two gun version. Of course one would need to create new scenarios that are better suited for the more powerful Bristol.

Historically the F2B had two rear guns (as opposed to the single-gun F2A) and it was frequently used and quiet successful (see e.g. http://www.theaerodrome.com/aircraft/gbritain/bristol_f2b.html
or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_F.2_Fighter

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 98days UrlicVonFlagg [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Panzer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Bombadil Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 98days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
   19years 98days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Lord_Biclopse Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Panzer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 98days litehoof Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Rottillo Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days warrax Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Oswald Boelcke Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Rottillo Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days warrax Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 97days UrlicVonFlagg Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
   19years 97days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
    19years 97days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
    19years 97days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
    19years 97days Panzer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 97days Impailer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 97days DBurkeG Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 97days BazJP Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 96days kduke Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 96days Dibbs Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
   19years 95days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 95days Bramley Bomber [BM][RULES] is this in the original rules?
19years 94days pokerguy Re: [BM][RULES] is this in the original rules?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 95days Bombadil [BM][BUG] "fired at before" bug?
19years 95days Dibbs Re: [BM][BUG] "fired at before" bug?
Page generated in: 27.34375 milliseconds.