YouPlayIt!YouPlayIt!LOGIN or Register 
LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
HomeYour GamesYour ProfileForumGames CreditsLinks DonateFAQ
Leagues
League IndexHow to PlayLeagues People PlayStatistics
Gonzaga
Play GonzagaNew!How to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
Blue Max
Play Blue MaxHow to PlayPlanes & Combat chartsScenarios ListGames People PlayStatisticsTactical AdviceThe Big Planes Race
Cartagena
Play CartagenaHow to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
Wooden Ships...
Play Wooden Ships...How to PlayGames People PlayStatisticsNewbies' guide
King Me!
Play King Me!How to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
VampiRing
Play VampiRingHow to PlayGames People PlayStatistics
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:leeds UK
Personal Data:Male, born: January 20 1972
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.leedswargamesclub.org.uk/
Membership22years 44days ago.
Last Login14years 276days ago.
Last Move14years 354days ago.
Bramley Bomber is currently Offline!Send a mail to Bramley Bomber

Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Rules
Subject: is this in the original rules?
Posted by: Bramley Bomber - 19years 95days ago.
Message text
http://youplay.it/play/bm_GameMove.asp?GameID=204091&UserID=Bramley%20Bomber

just looking at this game, i was wondering if this is a correct application of the rules?

i have just been awarded a fired bonus even though i was jammed the previous turn. i would have thought that i shouldnt get it as there would be no following fire as i would have been messing with the gun to unjam it.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
19years 95days Bramley Bomber [BM][RULES] is this in the original rules?
19years 94days pokerguy Re: [BM][RULES] is this in the original rules?
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
19years 94days pokerguy [BM][SYS] Campaigns
19years 94days Tornade Re: [BM][SYS] Campaigns
19years 94days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][SYS] Campaigns
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject
19years 98days UrlicVonFlagg [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Panzer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Bombadil Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 98days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
   19years 98days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Lord_Biclopse Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Sabelkatten Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Panzer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 98days litehoof Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days Rottillo Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 98days warrax Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Oswald Boelcke Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days Rottillo Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 98days warrax Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 97days UrlicVonFlagg Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
   19years 97days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
    19years 97days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
    19years 97days Tornade Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
    19years 97days Panzer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 97days Impailer Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 97days DBurkeG Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
19years 97days BazJP Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
 19years 96days kduke Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
  19years 96days Dibbs Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
   19years 95days moonglum01 Re: [BM][OT] New Aircraft
All trademarks or tradenames used in this Web site are the property of their respective owners.
Material may not be republished, nor may content or images be mirrored on another server without written permission.		 
Page generated in: 32.42188 milliseconds.