LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Capital District, NY US
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.swa-gaming.org
Membership19years 271days ago.
Last Login2years 138days ago.
Last Move5years 156days ago.
TXWard is currently Offline!Send a mail to TXWard


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:Site-maintenance and Administration
Subject:Re: New automove logic is good
Posted by: TXWard - 16years 145days ago.
Message text
Mongoose wrote:
imdog wrote:
BlackSheep wrote:
Nick wrote:
Hi,

you are right, for tail loop I must add a check and decide to force one of the player to move.

I have it in my TODO list.

Nick.

My suggestion would be to cancel the tailing for those identified as involved in a tail loop by the routine.
So nobody will say to that someone else has received a favor.


Two suggestion.

1. Forced the highest point move first.

2. Forced any one randomly.

I think a player tailing his teammate should be forced to move first.

I agree with Mongoose. It should be a random choice between pilots tailing his/her teammate.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 149days dcr66 [SYS] New automove logic is good
16years 149days bltzlfsk Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
16years 149days Bombadil Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
16years 149days JakobSperling Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
16years 149days dcr66 Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
16years 148days 99887 Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
 16years 148days parker Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
  16years 148days Nick Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
   16years 147days BlackSheep Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
    16years 145days imdog Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
     16years 145days Mongoose Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
     16years 145days TXWard Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
     16years 144days ksnake Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
16years 138days rainbow Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
 16years 138days dcr66 Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
  16years 136days rainbow Re: [SYS] New automove logic is good
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 135days aces_high [BM][RULES] fire damage
16years 134days markrendl Re: [BM][RULES] fire damage
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 142days GraysGhost [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
16years 141days Templars Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
 16years 141days Mad_Bomber Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
 16years 141days GraysGhost Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
  16years 140days TXWard Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
   16years 139days GraysGhost Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
    16years 138days TXWard Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
     16years 137days arkon Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
      16years 137days Templars Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
      16years 137days TXWard Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
      16years 137days Templars Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
      16years 137days TXWard Re: [BM][TOUR] 2010 Campaign - Playing for both sides
Page generated in: 26.5625 milliseconds.