Pitch wrote:
You are all very funny.
I really don't understand why playing an existing well known unbalanced game should bring to such irony.
Of course I know that D1's will never win in that scenario. What's the point? I shouldn't play it because of that? And is it a shame to ask what's the best score ever, because the scenario is unbalanced?
I play for fun. I get fun in unbalanced games on both sides more than from one-to-one games and I started this game with no idea about the score that I would have achieved. I don't go for records, I go for relax. It seems that some unbalanced scenarios are put there just to let people blame other people in this stupid way. If you enjoy this, continue, but don't blame me: I've got other more important things to think of.
I'm here for any game you want to invite me.
Beppi.
why the irony ?
a great hunter doesnt BRAG about how many ducks he can shoot in a barrel...
the scenario is totally lopsided so there is no justification to be proud of any result you might achieve when the system is totally loaded in your favour...IF you are able to personally shoot down every one of the enemy planes within say 24 turns and take NO damage at all...then maybe you would have cause to say you have achieved something
you are quite obviously concerned about the point score and achieving records or you would have made no comment about the score you achieved
i think we all play to have a great time...and there are unbalanced scenarios to reflect that not every battle you fight is gonna be a fair one... but in all the time i have been playing here (granted that's not long) you are the first player to actually brag about how great you are for winning a walkover
if you want to brag about an achievement...then achieve something...play a balanced scenario...play it from both sides...win both with that record score...i will be among the first to say congratulations for a game well played
MJC |
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
