LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Nashville, TN US
Personal Data:Male, born: September 15 1960
HomePage or other cool site:http://Also playing as Mongoose
Membership19years 235days ago.
Last Login5h 4' ago.
Last Move5h 49' ago.
pokerguy is currently Offline!Send a mail to pokerguy


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:General
Subject:Re: blue max ethic
Posted by: pokerguy - 10years 350days ago.
Message text
Christie wrote:
ecz67 wrote:
Christie wrote:
ecz67 wrote:
hello to everyone!

I'm a newbie playing here from a couple of weeks and with less than 10 games under my belt.

first of all congrats for this wonderful site where is easy arrange a fight with people very experienced and able to show you the hard way how Blue Max should be played.

That said I have a question about the ethic of who propose to play a scenario strongly unbalanced.

why one should create a game unbalanced AND pick the best side? I can imagine that a very experienced player asking for a challange, picks the less favourite side, but I see very often in the scenarios 1/1 ready to be joined only the weak plane is still available.

there are many well balanced scenarios at disposal, I understand one could still decide to play something unbalanced for fun and challenge, but what's the point to take "always" the strong side?
Am I missing something? thanks


I am a player with some experience and when I do post a 1 on 1 game that is unbalanced I too take the stronger plane. However, I then ALWAYS send a challenge game to the player who accepted the weaker plane therefore giving each player a chance using both planes. As was mentioned this can also be accomplished by joining a 1 on 1 league.

Just my 2 cents.

Pokerguy/Mongoose



Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 352days ecz67 blue max ethic
10years 352days bltzlfsk Re: blue max ethic
10years 352days imdog Re: blue max ethic
10years 352days markrendl Re: blue max ethic
10years 351days Christie Re: blue max ethic
10years 351days ecz67 Re: blue max ethic
 10years 351days Christie Re: blue max ethic
  10years 350days pokerguy Re: blue max ethic
10years 350days BlackSheep Re: blue max ethic
10years 350days wetty11 Re: blue max ethic
10years 343days DBurkeG Re: blue max ethic
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 344days DBurkeG [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
10years 344days DBurkeG Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
 10years 344days dcr66 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
  10years 341days dirtyed84 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 350days markrendl [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
10years 349days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
10years 348days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
 10years 348days markrendl Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
  10years 348days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
Page generated in: 31.25 milliseconds.