LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Osaka JP
Personal Data:Male,
Membership15years 229days ago.
Last Login6h 53' ago.
Last Move4h 34' ago.
markrendl is currently Offline!Send a mail to markrendl


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:General
Subject:Re: blue max ethic
Posted by: markrendl - 10years 352days ago.
Message text
ecz67 wrote:
hello to everyone!

I'm a newbie playing here from a couple of weeks and with less than 10 games under my belt.

first of all congrats for this wonderful site where is easy arrange a fight with people very experienced and able to show you the hard way how Blue Max should be played.

That said I have a question about the ethic of who propose to play a scenario strongly unbalanced.

why one should create a game unbalanced AND pick the best side? I can imagine that a very experienced player asking for a challange, picks the less favourite side, but I see very often in the scenarios 1/1 ready to be joined only the weak plane is still available.

there are many well balanced scenarios at disposal, I understand one could still decide to play something unbalanced for fun and challenge, but what's the point to take "always" the strong side?
Am I missing something? thanks


When I create 1 vs 1 games, I do them in pairs, playing one of each side. Of course, some folks simply sign up for one game and I end up playing two different opponents. Multiple plane games, can be done the same way.

People who post unbalanced 1 vs. 1 scenarios and take the stronger side, run the risk of the game not getting filled and getting deleted. Though sometimes, a newbie will sign up or a more experienced pilot looking for a challenge may give it a try.

markrendl

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 352days ecz67 blue max ethic
10years 352days bltzlfsk Re: blue max ethic
10years 352days imdog Re: blue max ethic
10years 352days markrendl Re: blue max ethic
10years 351days Christie Re: blue max ethic
10years 351days ecz67 Re: blue max ethic
 10years 351days Christie Re: blue max ethic
  10years 350days pokerguy Re: blue max ethic
10years 350days BlackSheep Re: blue max ethic
10years 350days wetty11 Re: blue max ethic
10years 343days DBurkeG Re: blue max ethic
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 344days DBurkeG [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
10years 344days DBurkeG Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
 10years 344days dcr66 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
  10years 341days dirtyed84 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 350days markrendl [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
10years 349days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
10years 348days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
 10years 348days markrendl Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
  10years 348days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
Page generated in: 32.8125 milliseconds.