LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

Country:IT
Personal Data:Male,
Membership11years 103days ago.
Last Login2years 96days ago.
Last Move2years 96days ago.
ecz67 is currently Offline!


Message header
Area/Game:General
Topic:General
Subject:Re: blue max ethic
Posted by: ecz67 - 10years 351days ago.
Message text
Christie wrote:
ecz67 wrote:
hello to everyone!

I'm a newbie playing here from a couple of weeks and with less than 10 games under my belt.

first of all congrats for this wonderful site where is easy arrange a fight with people very experienced and able to show you the hard way how Blue Max should be played.

That said I have a question about the ethic of who propose to play a scenario strongly unbalanced.

why one should create a game unbalanced AND pick the best side? I can imagine that a very experienced player asking for a challange, picks the less favourite side, but I see very often in the scenarios 1/1 ready to be joined only the weak plane is still available.

there are many well balanced scenarios at disposal, I understand one could still decide to play something unbalanced for fun and challenge, but what's the point to take "always" the strong side?
Am I missing something? thanks




I see you've met Sarmata. He's a coward who only plays those games to improve his statistics. If you ever start to defeat him he flies off the nearst side so he doesn't get shot down. He has no ethics or morals.

If you would like some training games where we talk to one another for tips and tricks, challenge me anytime you like.

Regards,

Kit


Hi
thanks all for the answers.
I'm asking in general since I'm new of the game not having anyone in particular in mind.

BTW I played twice with Sarmata 1/1, one victory, one defeat, and I have noticed nothing wrong in these games.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 352days ecz67 blue max ethic
10years 352days bltzlfsk Re: blue max ethic
10years 352days imdog Re: blue max ethic
10years 352days markrendl Re: blue max ethic
10years 351days Christie Re: blue max ethic
10years 351days ecz67 Re: blue max ethic
 10years 351days Christie Re: blue max ethic
  10years 350days pokerguy Re: blue max ethic
10years 350days BlackSheep Re: blue max ethic
10years 350days wetty11 Re: blue max ethic
10years 343days DBurkeG Re: blue max ethic
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 344days DBurkeG [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
10years 344days DBurkeG Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
 10years 344days dcr66 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
  10years 341days dirtyed84 Re: [OT] postmaster@youplay.it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

10years 350days markrendl [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
10years 349days imdog Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
10years 348days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
 10years 348days markrendl Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
  10years 348days wetty11 Re: [BM][SCE] 5 New Unbalanced Scenarios Available
Page generated in: 28.10059 milliseconds.