LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Invermay Park AU
Personal Data:Male, born: May 27 1970
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1274697573 and ref=profile
Membership18years 174days ago.
Last Login21h 58' ago.
Last Move21h 57' ago.
DarknessEternal is currently Offline!Send a mail to DarknessEternal


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: gun used for zero hex shots
Posted by: DarknessEternal - 16years 323days ago.
Message text
litehoof wrote:
The tail gunner has a cone of fire that starts but does not include the hex directly behind the plane. So he can not fire in a 0 hex situation. You may have to wait a loooooong time for a bug in the system to get a 0 hex tail gunner shot off.


As I understand it, there is a bug in the program that lists a zero hex kill for the gunner of a two-seater but that is not actually how it is recorded in the original board game. In the original board game, when a two seater kills an opponent in zero hex situation it is always recorded as a pilot victory, not an observer victory.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 323days aces_high [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
16years 323days Templars Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
 16years 323days aces_high Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
  16years 323days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 323days DarknessEternal Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 322days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 321days Templars Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
    16years 321days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 328days BMBug [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 328days FENRIS Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 328days BlackSheep Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 328days TnT Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
 16years 328days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 325days imdog Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 325days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 323days BlackSheep Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 319days Zarby Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 328days Mongoose [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
16years 327days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
16years 327days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
 16years 324days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
  16years 321days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
   16years 321days imdog Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
Page generated in: 44.14063 milliseconds.