LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:Baton Rouge US
Personal Data:Male,
Membership20years 256days ago.
Last Login1year 189days ago.
Last Move2years 119days ago.
Templars is currently Offline!Send a mail to Templars


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Rules
Subject:Re: gun used for zero hex shots
Posted by: Templars - 16years 323days ago.
Message text
The way the mechanism of zero hex works, it should be the front gun (in most cases). When you catch someone in the same hex, facing the same direction, but at a lesser speed, you have sort of let your opponent "slip past you", so it's the front gun that shoots.

Now if you stalled and the guy does a 27S2 ending in the opponent facing 180 degrees from your front, then I suppose the back gun would get the zero hex.

In my 4500 games, I've yet to see that.

aces_high wrote:
In the Bristol (or even other 2-seaters), when you have a zero hex shot, which gun is used to calculate the damage? Is it the front or back gun?

Also, if one of the guns is damaged or jammed, does the program revert to using the one "good" gun?

thanks,
aces


--- Message edited by Templars

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 323days aces_high [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
16years 323days Templars Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
 16years 323days aces_high Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
  16years 323days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 323days DarknessEternal Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 322days warrax Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
   16years 321days Templars Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
    16years 321days litehoof Re: [BM][RULES] gun used for zero hex shots
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 328days BMBug [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 328days FENRIS Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 328days BlackSheep Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 328days TnT Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
 16years 328days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 325days imdog Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 325days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 323days BlackSheep Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
16years 319days Zarby Re: [BM][BUG] This must be an error as I do not understand it
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 328days Mongoose [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
16years 327days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
16years 327days Capt-Tuttle Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
 16years 324days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
  16years 321days Mongoose Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
   16years 321days imdog Re: [BM][BUG] Damage not recorded
Page generated in: 26.5625 milliseconds.