Forum Message
| City: | Indiana  | | Personal Data: | Male, born: June 30 1963 | | Membership | 20years 213days ago. | | Last Login | 11h 41' ago. | | Last Move | 30' 25" ago. | Longneck is currently  | Send a mail to Longneck |
| | Message text Here are some specific examples of wrong (I think) or inconsistent league scores. These are all Simplified games, but I assume the league scoring works the same for either version.
http://www.youplay.it/play/ws_GameMove.asp?GameID=465693&UserID=Longneck
In this game, the winner received 2 points. Each side lost 50% of their ships, and the points scored are more than 15% apart. The way I read the league scoring rules, this should be a 1-point marginal victory. Perhaps the "best team player" bonus was awarded, but should not according to this on http://www.youplay.it/play/tn_Rules.asp "None is declared the best team player since only each team is composed by only one player."
http://www.youplay.it/play/ws_GameMove.asp?GameID=465704&UserID=Longneck
This game was a sweep -- one side completely destroyed, the others all survived. According to the strategic victory conditions "One side completely destroy the other and remain the only side on the map" this should have resulted in 4 points for derekticus, but he only got 3.
http://www.youplay.it/play/ws_GameMove.asp?GameID=454384&UserID=Longneck
The winner received 4 points, but lost 3/4 of his ships. This is apparently correct according to the definition of a strategic victory, but why did derekticus only get 3 but did better percentage-wise (in the previous example)?
http://www.youplay.it/play/ws_GameMove.asp?GameID=465708&UserID=Longneck
The winner was the only side left, lost 1/2 his ships, and received 3 points, but should have received 4, no?
Draws seem to be working. |
|
|
|
|
Donate
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
