I am inclined to assume that it might have been inflammatory for its own sake.
Best not to assume, and it was hardly inflammatory.
Point taken, I might have written it differently: "Since the original content of the post not available any longer and having only the thread subject as a reference, it is entirely possible that a reader is lead to assume that the post could have had inflammatory nature. The very removal of the post body and the statement contained in the subject very likely lead to that assumption, whether it is correct or not".
About its original content, I have to take your word for it. I just hope that my own message arrived at the intended recipient.
All trademarks or tradenames used in this Web site are the property of their respective owners. Material may not be republished, nor may content or images be mirrored on another server without written permission.