LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Cheshire UK
Personal Data:Male,
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.chimpage.com
Membership22years 74days ago.
Last Login14years 35days ago.
Last Move14years 270days ago.
Lord Locquax is currently Offline!Send a mail to Lord Locquax


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Site-maintenance and Administration
Subject:Re: New Statistics Recommendation
Posted by: Lord Locquax - 19years 99days ago.
Message text
kames wrote:
Now that league games are scored on a team basis instead of personal winners, some team statistics would be nice to see. Does one set of planes seem to win more than the the other side.

Love the stats BTW.

KEvin



I know statistics have generated a lot of debate through people wanting them changing in different ways. I think there's a strong case to say the current statistics favour pilots who have played the most games. You could play 30,000 games and only win 1 in 10 games and could find yourself at the top of the tables for the most games won even though you could be a very bad pilot

I'd like to see the statistics either changed to show things like "percentage of games won" or for pilots to be awarded a "rating".

I'm not sure how the rating would be determined exactly - it would have to be based on certain statistics, possibly "form" such as how many of your last 100 games you've won. But it would help new pilots to recognise "veterans" etc and would be something to aim for. You could lose skill by poor flying as well as gain it.

I've suggested a 5 star system before, but it would be something like:

* = Recruit
** = Novice
*** = Veteran
**** = Ace
***** = Legend

It could be somehow linked to experience (i.e. number of games played) so that long-playing pilots cannot sink lower than "veteran" or something.

These are just ideas - any thoughts?


Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 99days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
19years 99days imdog Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
 19years 99days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
19years 99days BazJP Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
 19years 99days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
  19years 99days Tornade Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
   19years 99days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
    19years 98days Tornade Re: [BM][SYS] New Statistics Recommendation
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 99days pokerguy [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
19years 99days BazJP Re: [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
19years 99days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
 19years 99days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
  19years 99days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
   19years 98days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
    19years 98days pokerguy Re: [BM][BUG] Damage applied incorrectly
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

19years 98days Lord Locquax [BM][TOUR] Latest Tables and Scores
19years 98days blan86 Re: [BM][TOUR] Latest Tables and Scores
19years 98days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][TOUR] Latest Tables and Scores
19years 98days Lord Locquax Re: [BM][TOUR] Latest Tables and Scores
19years 98days redwom Re: [BM][TOUR] Latest Tables and Scores
Page generated in: 28.125 milliseconds.