LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost on the new forumNext message

City:North York CA
Personal Data:Male, born: March 09 1968
HomePage or other cool site:http://https://worldofwarships.com/
Membership19years 227days ago.
Last Login8h 5' ago.
Last Move5days ago.
dcr66 is currently Offline!Send a mail to dcr66


Message header
Area/Game:Wooden Ships & Iron Men
Topic:Scenarios
Subject:Re: Trafalgar - Nile - others?
Posted by: dcr66 - 17years 154days ago.
Message text
derekticus wrote:

I will inquire on Monday. Has the wind been reversed in all scenarios (pirates not included)? I know at one point that was also in the works.
I had built a 6-on-6 scenario by reducing one of the historical scenarios out of the old game's rule book, but it was deemed to be too unbalanced, as I kept the "English crack vs French average" crew ratings. Truthfully, either the points ratings of the ships must be changed, or the "crack vs average" crew ratings must remain, otherwise the scenario becomes unbalanced when played in "basic rules" mode where the French can always resort to boarding if the encounter seems to be going against them, and then the smaller English crews often find themselves completely overwhelmed.


Other than Arbuthnot and Havana5 on the non-pirates scenario, everything else has the wind reverse variations. I think we can use some scenarios that look like these:
  • Battles that involves Frigates only. Not 1 on 1 but multiple frigates on each side.
  • Frigates taking on SOLs.

    They don't have to be balanced as long as it is winnable for both sides even in Simplified rules.

  • Back to the messages list
    Messages thread
    Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

    17years 157days Templars [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
    17years 157days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
    17years 155days Clangador Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
     17years 155days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
     17years 155days dcr66 Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
      17years 154days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
       17years 154days dcr66 Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
     17years 153days DarknessEternal Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
      17years 152days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
       16years 347days imdog Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
        16years 347days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
         16years 346days scotireb Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
          16years 346days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][SCE] Trafalgar - Nile - others?
    Next thread
    Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

    16years 344days gugliandalf [BM][SCE] New scenario
    16years 344days dcr66 Re: [BM][SCE] New scenario
    16years 344days gugliandalf Re: [BM][SCE] New scenario
    16years 344days BlackSheep Re: [BM][SCE] New scenario
    Previous thread
    Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

    16years 350days Nick [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 350days warrax Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 350days TXWard Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 349days gugliandalf Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 348days gugliandalf Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 349days Emerych Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 348days imdog Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    16years 347days Bombadil Re: [SYS] Is site faster ?
    Page generated in: 21.875 milliseconds.