LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Capital District, NY US
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.swa-gaming.org
Membership18years 315days ago.
Last Login1year 182days ago.
Last Move4years 201days ago.
TXWard is currently Offline!Send a mail to TXWard


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Suggestions, improvement, critics
Subject:Re: Ranks
Posted by: TXWard - 16years 281days ago.
Message text
GraysGhost wrote:
dcr66 wrote:
scotireb wrote:
Trouble wrote:
I would like to see ranks for all the players. piloys starting out would be rookies and after 100 kills advance to 2nd lieutenant
,etc.


It might be fun but there would to many generals.


Not just generals, there will be a few Commander in Chiefs as well.


I think the number of kills is a red herring as some people take 1000 games to get 100 kills, whilst others take 200 games.

To get a rank it should be based on your success rate.

Divide the number of games by the number of kills. This gives a score that when multiplied by 100 gives an easier one to categorise (mine is about 31.82 at the moment) and ranks should be given based upon that score.

If you suddenly hit a bad spell and your rate reduces, then you are downgraded. That way everyone will not end up as Air Chief Marshalls.

Bad players will remain as Flight Sergeants and the better players improve over time.

Just a thought.

Kit


That's the problem when you start talking stats and rankings. There isn't a good method to use that isn't distorted somehow.

Number of kills is distorted by number of games played. Someone might achieve the same rank as another player even though it took 10X as many games to do so.

Percentage of kills to games is distorted by multiplayer games vs. duels. Your example is perfect for that. Despite being shot down more often than killing an opponent, your percentage of kills to games is still high.

I tend to look at the old statistics and average the rankings of the 3 categories. A pilot who is at the top of one list, but near the bottom of the other two is lower ranked than someone who is in the 50th place on all three.

Either way, it is just going to be another way to rank people and not an accurate gauge of their real skills.

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 282days Trouble [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
16years 282days scotireb Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
16years 281days dcr66 Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
 16years 281days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
  16years 281days TXWard Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
  16years 278days DBurkeG Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
   16years 276days GraysGhost Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
    16years 276days DBurkeG Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
16years 281days ksnake Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
 16years 281days dcr66 Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
  16years 279days pokerguy Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
   16years 279days BlackSheep Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
    16years 278days SteveMartin Re: [BM][IDEAS] Ranks
Next thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 278days taliapharaoh [WS&IM][IDEAS] Backing Sails?
16years 277days derekticus Re: [WS&IM][IDEAS] Backing Sails?
 16years 276days Longneck Re: [WS&IM][IDEAS] Backing Sails?
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

16years 278days GraysGhost [BM][BUG] New Active Leagues Page
16years 276days GraysGhost Re: [BM][BUG] New Active Leagues Page
Page generated in: 32.03125 milliseconds.