LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


Register...Forgot password?
Main menu
Leagues
Gonzaga
Blue Max
Cartagena
Wooden Ships...
King Me!
VampiRing
Forum Message
Previous messagePost a replyNext message

City:Guildford UK
Personal Data:Male, born: September 19 1968
Membership22years 294days ago.
Last Login7h 56' ago.
Last Move11h 32' ago.
tomski is currently Offline!Send a mail to tomski


Message header
Area/Game:Blue Max
Topic:Other
Subject:Re: Old codger
Posted by: tomski - 7days 17h ago.
Message text
Electro wrote:
tomski wrote:
I know it's been a huge amount of work, and technically its very clever, but does anyone else just prefer the 'old' version? (I really am very sorry...)

The blue hex map, the beautiful artwork on the planes and the incredible simplicity for what made a very good game. It looks like Blue Max, it plays like Blue Max, it feels like Blue Max.

I bought my first edition copy some 40+ years ago. I still haven't punched my copy of the 2013 reworking.

I think I'll just have to call the new version by another name. I'm sure it'll be a great game, but with so many changes, I prefer my Blue Max as Blue Max.

I do, sometimes.

So, I think what I need to do is in classic BM games (without Altitude), try to replicate the simplicity of what we have here.
Thats what 2D view approximates. Give me some time. At some point, this site must go away. It's the way of things.

It doesn't mean the new site has to stomp all over it though. Altitude! rules require 3D, so much time was spent on that. I did try to make a 'classic' version of Cartegena, and I'm happy to do that for BlueMax.

I want to remind everyone, I'm doing this for you, the players. If something doesn't 'float your boat' or 'put the wind under your wings', tell me what it is and what you'd like to see instead.

--- Message edited by Electro

This is an amazing response, thank you.
I'm sorry if I sounded too whingey, that wasn't entirely my aim

Can we have a representation of the RRR or B3R in the damage reports from other people's fire please? I find it much easier to read than 1 blue, 3 red which can be split over a line.

I'm not up to speed on all the previous posts or work, but is there (very briefly) a reason we can't keep this site? It does work so beautifully thanks to everyone's work over the years...

Back to the messages list
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

8days 18h tomski [BM][OT] Old codger
8days 6h Electro Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
8days 6h brewk001 Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
8days 5h darken Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
8days 4h dcr66 Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
7days 17h tomski Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
5days 15h Electro Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
1day 4h markrendl Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
8days 5h darken Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
6days 15h pokerguy Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
 6days 1h Electro Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
 3days 9h darken Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
  2days 6h Electro Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
 1day 4h markrendl Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
3days 11h mjk1964 Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
3days 11h mjk1964 Re: [BM][OT] Old codger
Previous thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

77days 20h gugliandalf [OT] Memory lane
70days 12h BlackSheep Re: [OT] Memory lane
10days 18h tomski Re: [OT] Memory lane
Page generated in: 21.09375 milliseconds.