Rahab wrote:


First : He apologized in the game, after some times. It has not been made excuses for 4 movements. It has not been made excuses alone, but only when I have raised the thing: it calls late reaction, for me.

Second : Task that such behaviors must be known from all, because they can regard all (today it touches me, tomorrow goodness knows...). I task that the general dissaproval is more important than one personal reaction in many cases.
Perhaps this is true, inasmuch as it has had all the time to make it before that I decided to open a "forum issue".

Third : I am content that has been made excuses to the end, but it remain the fact that the part offense without reason has been I: it is absurdity that you, Templars, arrives to things ended in order to reproach me of my reaction, than however he has been civil, motivated and detailed (to the contrary of the offense).
We are one community: the minimum it's that who mistakes, is rendered public. I do not see just null of strange.
.... As it is right that publics are rendered the merits, the excuses and the rest.

And by the way, questioning his "class" over an online hex game - hmm - that's an interesting analysis to arrive at. Perhaps its you who owes him an apology.

May I ask you just what you had originally hoped to accomplish from posting any of this here?