Templars wrote:
Well darken, thats a nice big ole red target enticement to get me started. However, you are incorrect. I don't think what I wrote or discussed was "spam", by every definition of the word. You're a pretty short sighted fellow aren't you to say so. Tell you what, why don't you email me directly, and we can continue this there.
LMAO Only a tried and true card carrying forum lawyer would try to argue that the mass bumping of dead threads with inane comments is not considered spam. (I'm just joking you on the lawyering part templars. )
Anyway, I can see that the greater trees were lost in the forest. This isn't really a personal thing. I disagree with your, and many others, actions in this controversy, and I told you so. I figure you were big enough to take it. If you want to write me personally, go ahead. I will respect the privacy of that forum.
darken
Edit: I wrote this post before I read your email to me personally. I will not be responding to that email.
--- Message edited by darken |