Regis wrote:
I completely second Pokerguy and Sajami on this one: they just both agreed to play Russian roulette, but still with somewhat chivalry adding spice to a "dead" game.
...
i don't agree with you point of view in this case. you are right telling about "adding spice to a dead game", but this is not the case.
let's talk about russian roulette:
In the russian roulette you have 1/6 possibilities (16.6%) of shot yourself.
In this BM game, the two players shot each other at combat value 4. for this column u have only 1 possibility of 1 red card (16.6% like the russian roulette). But in the (original) BM Game there are 35 Red cards. Between theses you have 2 PK cards and 1 PE card. So you have more or less 8.50% of drawing one of these card on a single Red. Now apply this to the 16.6% and we have a wanderful (more or less) 1.5%.
it is a really low risk! so thay aren't adding spice, but add points.
Marcuza wrote:
...
It's not the result, but the intention. By the way, it was better with that draw that with a random shot down from one side.
Anyway it is done in a league and not in a private game, that's a lack of respect versus the other players involved.
...
i totally agree with marcuza for the moral question. in your private games you can do what you want, but in this context you are playing a league so u cannot "organize" your game. it is not acceptable.
ciao sbadranga |