LOGIN
User Name
Password
Remember me


> Not a member yet?
> Forgot your password?
Main menu
Preferred site
Get Firefox!
Forum Message
Country:CX
Personal Data:Male, born: June 17 1960
HomePage or other cool site:http://www.boardgamegeek.com
Membership19years 89days ago.
Last Login3years 152days ago.
Last Move4years 309days ago.
derekticus is currently Offline!

Message header
Area/Game:General
1Topic:General discussion
Subject:Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
Posted by: derekticus - 15years 42days ago.
Message text
BlueDragon wrote:
Here's a link to Derek's Field of Fire Rules:
http://www.youplay.it/beta/play/FieldOfFire-Derek.pdf


Has anyone looked at these? Any comments?
My goal was to use the Basic Games' concepts and bring them forward to the Advanced Game without all the confusion of the original rules which tried to deal with 5 fields of fire but failed to thoroughly define them. In the end Avalon Hill allowed for ships to "rifle" their broadsides, either shooting ONLY into fields 4 and 5, OR, completely ignoring closer ships in fields 4 and 5.
Neither of those options work for me.
Messages thread
Posting elapsed timePosted bySubject

15years 99days derekticus WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
15years 98days BlueDragon Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
15years 97days derekticus Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
 15years 97days BlueDragon Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
  15years 96days BlueDragon Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
   15years 42days derekticus Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
    15years 36days karllagov Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
    14years 325days BlueDragon Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
13years 346days SgtTodd Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
 13years 332days BlueDragon Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
  13years 332days SgtTodd Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
   13years 331days BlueDragon Re: WS&IM - New Advanced Field of Fire Rules
Page generated in: 21.875 milliseconds.